By: Major General S. G. Vombatkere
Mainstream, 28 September 2015
The Government of India (GoI)
finally announced its version of One-Rank-One-Pension (OROP) for military
Veterans. This was welcomed only in part by the Veterans, because there were
important sticking points which were not included or inadequately included in
the announcement. Fortunately, the Veterans who were on fast-unto-death were
persuaded to end their fast, but the Veterans’ resolve to remain on protest
until the outstanding points were settled to their satisfaction, resulted in
planning a “Sainik Ekta Rally” on September 12 at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar.
But reverting to the GoI’s OROP
announce-ment, obviously at the instance of the bureau-cracy, it included a
hitherto unmentioned stipulation that soldiers who opt for VRS (voluntary
retirement scheme) would not be entitled to OROP. When the GoI was informed
that there was no concept of VRS in the defence services, the same stipulation
was shifted to soldiers who took premature retirement. This has angered
Veterans because many soldiers take premature retirement since promotion
avenues are severely limited, or because there are problems in distant homes,
or they try their luck at some job in civvy street since there is no job
assurance on retirement anyway. Today, Veterans are waiting for the GoI’s
signed document on OROP since they have been repeatedly cheated and have long
since ceased to trust the spoken word of politicians and bureaucrats.
Ekta Rally
It is learned that the GoI had
“advised” Veterans not to hold the “Ekta Rally”. But the rally on September 12
was a huge success, with thousands of Veterans from all over India converging
at Jantar Mantar, exceeding the expectations of the organisers. When TV crews
present were asked as to why the rally was not being screened, on condition of
anonymity they revealed that the GoI had “advised” the TV channel managements
not to air the event. It has also come to light that buses crammed with
Veterans were stopped at the Delhi border to deter Veterans (all old and many
infirm) from reaching Jantar Mantar.
It is abundantly clear that the GoI
has tried, unsuccessfully as it turned out, to make the “Ekta Rally” fail. But
Veterans, even some in wheel-chairs, have spoken with their feet; the
discomfiture of the GoI is complete. One Veteran even asked whether the GoI’s
strategem of breaking the Veterans’ unity was a harbinger of the days to come.
Serious rumblings! And what would be the thoughts of the serving soldier on his
cold vigil on the Himalayan and trans-Himalayan heights?
The World Watches
It has already been brought out how
apex-scale-pension retired bureaucrat Avay Shukla’s article titled “The Bitter
Truth About OROP”, in which he argued that OROP is “inherently flawed”, “cannot
be limited to the armed forces only”, and is “neither fair nor possible”, was
being gleefully discussed in “Pakistan Defence”. <http://defence.pk/threads/the-bitte...>
The whole world, and especially India’s neighbours, are well aware that the
GoI’s intransigence on the OROP issue is affecting the morale of the serving
soldier who guards our frontiers. However, the GoI, under the thrall of an
obstinately self-serving and strategically myopic civil service, appears to be
oblivious to the rapidly worsening situation. It has escaped nobody’s attention
that PM Narendra Modi, ordinarily a self-confident and loquacious person, has
not spoken with Veterans since the agitation began, and speculation of the
reason is rife. The unfortunate gap in civil-military relations having widened
to a chasm is apparent.
The Veterans’ agitation at Jantar
Mantar, starting on June 14, 2015, moving on to relay fast and finally some
Veterans undertaking fast-unto-death to force the hand of the GoI to announce
OROP, is undoubtedly being watched by intelligence agencies worldwide, and
especially by Pakistan and China. Its effect on serving soldiers would
inevitably be carefully assessed.
Military Capability
It is well to note that the weapons,
ammunition and equipment deficiencies—which were revealed by the then Army
Chief, Gen V.K. Singh, to the consternation and annoyance of the UPA
Government—have not yet been made up. It is not known whether the National
Security Council (NSC) has consulted Gen V.K. Singh, since retired, who is a
Union Minister in the present GoI, on this critical issue.
It is wisely said that the quality
of the man-behind-the-gun is at least as important as the availability and
quality of the gun itself. Indeed, the GoI is commemorating 50 years of the
1965 war against Pakistan, during which Pakistan’s designs were soundly
defeated by motivated Indian soldiers using dated arms and equipment pitted
against Pakistan’s superior Patton tanks and F-86 Sabre jet aircraft gifted by
the USA. But today, 50 years later, the man-behind-the-gun is unhappy due to
persistent injustices and indignities heaped upon him over the decades by the
bureaucrat-politician nexus. And India’s military capability is further
degraded by shor-tages of weapons, ammunition and equipment.
Joining the Dots
It is for the NSC to consider
whether the increase in ceasefire and LOC violations by Pakistan, and the
Pakistan Army Chief’s belligerent statements, are actually Pakistan testing
India’s political will and military capability.
It must be recalled that soon after
Narendra Modi assumed office as the PM, he sat cordially with Chinese President
Xi Ping on a “jhoola” on the banks of the Sabarmati. At that very time,
Chinese troops had made incursions near Depsang-la across the LAC in Ladakh.
Today, on September 12, the ominous breaking news is that Chinese workers have
started constructing permanent defences near Burtse (not far from Depsang-la),
and when the Indian troops objected, Chinese troops have moved in.
One must recall that the attack by
China in 1962 began in October, the month when Indian troops begin to
experience increasing mobility difficulties in the Himalayan terrain as winter
progresses, while Chinese troops have little or no such mobility constraints
and are today further advantaged by firm logistics of the railway link to
Lhasa. In 1962, as now, India’s soldier was ill-equipped and there was a huge
gap in civil-military relations. But today the situation also includes a sense
of disillusionment among the serving soldiers, which did not obtain in 1962.
PM Modi, and the NSC which he heads,
may have to think and act very quickly to assess the real-time joint
Pakistan-China threat. In any case, they would do well to urgently create a
single-point-of-military-advice by appointing a military officer as the
National Security Advisor (as NSA-External) in addition to the existing NSA who
would advise on internal security. This writer hopes and prays that his
apprehen-sions of external threat are unfounded.
Major General S.G.
Vombatkere, VSM, retired in 1996 as the Additional DG Discipline and Vigilance
in the Army HQ AG’s Branch. He holds a Ph.D degree in Structural Dynamics from
IIT Madras. He is the Adjunct Associate Professor of the University of Iowa,
USA, in international studies. With over 450 published papers in national and
international journals and seminars, his current area of interest is strategic
and development-related issues.
Be that as it may, returning to the GoI's OROP declare ment, clearly at the case of the agency cracy, it incorporated an up to this point unmentioned stipulation that fighters who decide on VRS (willful retirement plan) would not be qualified for OROP. At the point when the GoI was educated that there was no understanding of VRS in the resistance benefits, the same stipulation was moved to warriors who took untimely retirement.
ReplyDeleteIf you are looking for a Indian Military Government jobs and want to make a career in Government Service then Apply urgent opening
ReplyDelete